Jan Vermeer’s paint­ing from 1665 is remark­able for what it says and doesn’t say.


The Girl With the Pearl Earring.

 

The Girl With the Pearl Earring, by Jan Vermeer. 1665

I stud­ied it in school many years ago, and have always loved it, but now see it dif­fer­ently, with a back story and another face there. A merger, a gap, a cross­ing. Scarlett Johansson stares back at me now. She didn’t then. I saw some­thing else. I saw beau­ti­ful, lush brush strokes, vibrant, heated col­ors, and a woman who was bemused, expe­ri­enced, per­haps even a touch annoyed that her life had been inter­rupted for a moment or two. An annoy­ance at first that quickly changed into remem­brance, tol­er­ance, and sub­dued, qui­es­cent, inter­nal laughter.

Scarlett’s girl, on the other hand, is dif­fer­ent. She is not expe­ri­enced. She is truly inno­cent, but burst­ing with some­thing she doesn’t yet see. Something that is so deep and per­sonal and real and organic, she has no idea she pos­sesses an allure that tran­scends time, place, and cir­cum­stances. When she takes off that scarf and lets her long hair down for the first time, the shock to the viewer is beyond words. Vermeer should have painted that, as well.

This paint­ing, this young woman, or girl, or muse, or incar­na­tion of the god­dess in mod­est, ter­res­trial form, deserves as much atten­tion as Da Vinci’s Lisa. Vermeer cap­tured some­thing he knew he could not pos­sess or hold back. Perhaps he knew he could not pos­sess her. Perhaps he real­ized that the Eternal Feminine is sim­ply the rap­tur­ous knowl­edge of the power of change.

Related Posts: