Watched the Sean Penn film last night, and thought it deeply mov­ing, well-​​made, and thought-​​provoking. Based on a true story, the movie fol­lows Jon Krakauer’s 1996 book closely. Penn chron­i­cles the wan­der­ings of Christopher McCandless across America, pro­vides essen­tial back­ground through flash­backs and voice-​​overs, and takes us all the way to the ter­mi­nus of Alaska in 1992. It’s a very strong film, one that deserves a wider audience.

Wrangell mountains, Alaska

The per­for­mances by the chief actors are excel­lent, espe­cially Emile Hirsch as Christopher, and Catherine Keener as Jan Burres, a friend he makes along the way. I also liked Kristen Stewart (in an all too brief role) as Tracy Tatro, a girl with an enor­mous crush on Chris, who he meets through Jan and her hus­band, Rainey.

Back to the book for a moment:

Interesting par­al­lels exist between Krakauer and McCandless, which must have made the writ­ing more dif­fi­cult, per­sonal, per­haps even cathar­tic … (Parallels exist between Penn and McCandless as well, but will save that aspect for another day)

Both risked every­thing to pur­sue soli­tude, to over­come nat­ural obsta­cles, to fight extremes of weather, ter­rain and topog­ra­phy. Krakaeur, for instance, climbed Mount Everest in 1996, but most of his team per­ished in the descent. I have not read the book yet, so am not sure if fur­ther par­al­lels are there … such as the impact of read­ing Jack London, Tolstoy, and Thoreau (on McCandless). Or, if Krakauer had (or has) such a strong ide­al­ism and sense of human­i­tar­ian mis­sion. The movie por­trays a young man deter­mined to break free from soci­etal chains, as he saw them. Lies, hypocrisy, extreme mate­ri­al­ism, cru­elty to one another, are key notes of Chris’s cri­tique. McCandless begins his final jour­ney by giv­ing away money ear­marked for law school ($24,000) to Oxfam.

I was left with many strong feel­ings after watch­ing the film. Perhaps the one that stays with me the longest will be the sense of tragic irony, waste, and loss. Christopher McCandless seemed like a young man deeply com­mit­ted to the pos­si­bil­ity that ide­al­ism can be matched with effec­tive action. He must have expe­ri­enced a severely con­flicted dynamic, push­ing and pulling hm back into and away from the human world. Ultimately, his choices deprived that world of that rare breed of per­son who believes pas­sion­ately, vig­or­ously, per­haps even ath­let­i­cally in pro­gres­sive change. We need more peo­ple like him, and we need those peo­ple to sur­vive their wan­der­ings and their dark nights of the soul.

Related Posts: