Humans have two choices. Well, we actu­ally have mil­lions of choices, but for the pur­pose of this post, we have two.

Believe in a divin­ity that guides our lives and con­trols the uni­verse, or in a uni­verse that guides itself, leav­ing us basi­cally on our own.

Strike that. There may just be a third choice in there some­where. Yes. At least for the pur­pose of this post. The belief in a divine entity that no orga­nized reli­gion has yet described, defined, or even remotely got­ten close to. Remember, there have been thou­sands of orga­nized reli­gions through­out the cen­turies, and thou­sands of deities on dis­play. Putting them side by side for a moment, let­ting them hash out their dif­fer­ences across time and space, might just bring us the world’s great­est jam ses­sion. Or, the mother of all headaches. Devotees would root for their own, pas­sion­ately, obsti­nately, vigorously.Perhaps more than just vig­or­ously.

To me, the fact that there have been so many iter­a­tions of deities, so many attempts to describe and re-​​describe the mys­tery of life, so many var­ied forms of wor­ship, means that the search goes on and must go on. Perhaps for­ever. It means that dif­fer­ent con­texts, cul­tures and geo­gra­phies cre­ate dif­fer­ent sets of needs, fears and yearn­ings, which lead inevitably to dif­fer­ent iter­a­tions and forms of quest­ing, ques­tion­ing and worship.

Athena Mattei, the Louvre

Athena Mattei. The Louvre, Paris.

Power, empire and coer­cion, of course, throw an arbi­trary wrench into this nat­ural process and reduce the num­ber of organ­i­cally evolv­ing forms. They homog­e­nize and com­mod­ify. They limit, nar­row, direct and con­serve. They inject ortho­doxy, dogma and doc­trine into a process that is, by def­i­n­i­tion, the great­est, most open-​​ended search we make in our own minds. Or could make, if we were truly free.

If we were truly free to have long walks and talks with our­selves, with­out the whole world buzzing about, with­out our par­ents and the soci­ety as a whole try­ing to direct us toward this or that belief .…

But time will not be sus­pended indef­i­nitely. There will even­tu­ally be more iter­a­tions, incar­na­tions, and new jus­ti­fi­ca­tions for yet more divine forms. Religions will rise and fall and the for­tunes of those run­ning the show will rise and fall. Their orga­ni­za­tions, restric­tions, repres­sions and ortho­dox­ies will fade into the prover­bial dust­bin of his­tory. It was always thus.

End Times? Last Days? Pretty much all reli­gions, across time, across the globe have posited those things. Ironically, rather than their prophe­cies ever com­ing true (we’re still here, right?), the only things that seem to reach those End Times are the reli­gions and empires themselves.

Back to that deity yet to be named. If I am to believe in a divine being, I can’t believe in one that con­trols the uni­verse and indi­vid­ual lives. It just brings about too many prob­lems for me, intel­lec­tu­ally. To boil it all down to its essence: suf­fer­ing and laugh­ter. A city is destroyed, a war rages, famine engulfs, while oth­ers live healthy, happy, long lives filled with joy and laugh­ter. Not to men­tion, whole species dis­ap­pear. New species evolve. Of course, there’s a lot more to it than just that, but that’s prob­a­bly the main fac­tor for me. Life just doesn’t have the look and feel of any­thing “planned.” Genocides and prom nights are too great a diver­gence for me to handle.

That said, I can see the pos­si­bil­ity of a divine being that cre­ated the uni­verse and moved on. That makes sense to me, if I’m going to believe in a divine source at all. A deist view, basi­cally. The one that most of the American founders held.

Of course, I read­ily see the ben­e­fits of belief. The com­fort it brings to mil­lions. The inner strength. The sense of pur­pose. And, of course, as an artist I can’t help but rejoice in the beauty cre­ated in the name of those deities through time. The artis­tic expres­sion of spir­i­tual yearn­ing, quest­ing and ques­tion­ing has enriched all cultures.

Still, I won­der, and ques­tions, a mul­ti­tude of ques­tions, remain. If there is only one, then why have we seen thou­sands? Why has there been so much vari­ety, diver­sity, so many pow­er­ful expres­sions of the numi­nous through the cen­turies? With expres­sion that diverse and pow­er­ful, can any­one claim to know that the mys­tery has been solved once and for all? And should we really want it solved?

 

Related Posts: