What is sacred? Know­ing that the sacred has changed across time and space, know­ing that it will change again and again and again, how do we deal with the quandary of hold­ing cer­tain things above the fray, ver­sus switch­ing the sacred as new evi­dence appears? Or as empires collapse?

Detail of the Acropolis. By Aaron Logan. 2004

Detail of the Acrop­o­lis. By Aaron Logan. 2004

There is a quandary. Rather, one of a mul­ti­tude of quan­daries. That we should cling to the sacred despite change, or the accu­mu­lated wis­dom of cen­turies, or hold noth­ing above the fray. In other words, live in the moment, for the moment, with no hier­ar­chies of the sacred, or remain locked in those hierarchies.

Per­haps the quandary is over­stated. Most of us do not deal in absolutes. Most of us do not live either/​or lives, black and white lives, manichean lives. Most of us do nuance, degrees, lev­els. We can han­dle com­plex­ity and uncer­tainty. Per­haps bet­ter now than before the advent of var­i­ous sci­en­tific for­ays into uncer­tainty and inde­ter­mi­nancy. Con­ven­tional wis­dom, iron­i­cally, tells us that noth­ing is ever certain.

That said, is there not a cer­tain kind of momen­tum involved in belief? Is there not a cer­tain kind of acqui­es­cence to the sacred of a given place and time? And does this acqui­es­cence, in effect, amount to a loss of the uncer­tainty prin­ci­ple? Does it not, in effect, amount to a loss of doubt, and an accep­tance of a cer­tain kind of absolutism?

Know­ing where and when to draw the prover­bial line. Know­ing where and when to say, yes, I am not sure about many things, but this I am sure of. We could not get through the day with­out a cer­tain amount of givens, assump­tions, abso­lutisms. We could not get through hard times with­out even more of those bedrocks. And in times of extremis, we need unshaken foun­da­tions with­out gaps to stand on. We need at least some certainties.

It is up to each of us to find our own idea and ideals of the sacred, and this should hap­pen in an atmos­phere as free of bias as pos­si­ble. With­out lim­its, with­out repres­sions. The whole world should be on the table for us. A world of wis­dom offered, like an all-​​you-​​can-​​eat banquet.

School of Athens, by Raphael. 1510. Vatican City.

School of Athens, by Raphael. 1510. Vat­i­can City.

Of course, I have my own biases when it comes to that. I would wish for the world to be sat­u­rated in color, in music, in art. I would wish for the world to know all the great philoso­phers, mys­tics and artists from around the world, across the cen­turies. Because I think the impact of a truly diverse and eclec­tic edu­ca­tion is invalu­able. Not just a cos­mopoli­tan edu­ca­tion, but a cos­mo­log­i­cal one. Because, when it comes down to it, the thing I hold sacred above all else is the jour­ney toward truth. And that jour­ney starts with the accu­mu­la­tion of knowl­edge. And that accu­mu­la­tion can not be real­ized when one is chained.

Please share with oth­ers:
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email

Related Posts

  1. The Ques­tion
  2. What Price Freedom?