Liberty Leading the People, by Eugene Delacroix. 1830

Liberty Leading the People. Eugene Delacroix. 1830. The Louvre, Paris


Well, no dirty thoughts, really. Not since I put away the gar­den and yard stuff, washed my hands, and type now with clean fingers.

Anyway, was think­ing again about Ani DiFranco and how she’s grown, matured, evolved. A mother now, she’s no longer the punk­ish rebel girl, the fight­ing fusion artist for grrrrl power. At least not overtly. At least not in the same way she brought to the fore in the early 90s. And she’s caught some flak from some fans because of that. Because she evolved over time. Because she wears a dress and puts on lip­stick now and then. Funny thing about free­dom, and inde­pen­dence, and non-​​conformity. You can’t stand still. If you do, nine times out of ten, you no longer can claim free­dom, inde­pen­dence or non-​​conformity. Especially if you remain in a cer­tain place to please your fans. By def­i­n­i­tion, that’s not free­dom. That’s let­ting oth­ers con­trol you. Even sti­fle you.

Odd that we humans want our heroes to stay the same. Odd that we want heroes at all, really. But most odd is the idea that rebel­lion entails a set of pro­ce­dures, uni­forms and talk­ing pat­terns. Most odd that fans of rebels don’t see that a uni­form, any uni­form, even if it’s a counter-​​cultural one, is … well … as Gertrude Sherwood Anderson Hemingway Warhol once said … A uni­form is a uni­form is a uniform.

Back in my uni­ver­sity days, long, long ago, I remem­ber an ini­tial fas­ci­na­tion with a group of self-​​proclaimed rebels with­out a pause. In the art depart­ment. They looked dif­fer­ent. Talked in a dif­fer­ent way. Dressed in ways out of tune with the masses. Funny thing was, it didn’t take long before I real­ized that their rebel­lion involved a cer­tain con­for­mity and pres­sure to main­tain that rebel­lion. They wore uni­forms. Not the same as the masses, but uni­forms nonethe­less. I don’t think they noticed that fact.

The above also led me to pon­der the dif­fer­ence between writ­ers and rock stars. In a way, the writer is blessed with far less scrutiny regard­ing such things. Far less scrutiny regard­ing his or her rev­o­lu­tion­ary bonafides. This is mostly a mat­ter of the dif­fer­ence in pub­lic expo­sure, and is rather obvi­ous. We don’t see them. We see enter­tain­ment stars all too often. And, with writ­ers, I think they get the ben­e­fit of time. Critics don’t have them on their radar 24/​7, so their evo­lu­tions and mat­u­ra­tions can hap­pen under the radar, mostly.

Ani? She hasn’t had a moment’s rest, most likely.

Of course, I always wanted to be both a rock star and a world famous author. My rev­o­lu­tion­ary bonafides would have been the stuff of cen­turies of leg­end and instant twit­ter updates.

Anonymity has its advantages.

Related Posts: