
Tarantula Nebula, as seen from the Hubble Telescope
Â
Yesterday I talked about the story of Adam and Eve in terms of metaphor. The metaphor of leavÂing the garÂden of blissÂful ignoÂrance to become fully human. Today, I’m thinkÂing about how much we’re drawn back to the idea of that blissÂful ignoÂrance, from West to East, from ancient to modÂern beings. Many of us, whether or not we subÂscribe to any sacred text, orgaÂnized reliÂgion, or group of reliÂgious beliefs, still find ourÂselves drawn to the idea of becomÂing at one with the all. Merging, blendÂing, fusÂing with the All. In a sense, we seek a loss of conÂsciousÂness, a loss of disÂcernÂment between this and that, now and then, before and after, and all oppoÂsites. We want an end to disÂcrimÂiÂnaÂtion, to the necesÂsity of choosÂing, difÂferÂenÂtiÂatÂing, sinÂgling out. We seek an end to foreÂground and backÂground and want Cezannesque plains, bleedÂing into Rothko-​​like envelÂopÂment. Be it for a moment, a trance, a truce, or the final spacÂing out, we seek a return of sorts to that moment in the garÂden when we merely lived in the moment withÂout conÂsciousÂness of our place within the ancient nexus.
There are, of course, many shades and degrees and levÂels to all of this. On both sides of the ledger. There are many paraÂdoxes involved as well. Perhaps the toughÂest to get around is the desire to be both unconÂscious and conÂscious of that loss at the same time. To be free of all demands and requireÂments involvÂing choice and disÂcernÂment and the awareÂness of that, while being aware of our spacÂing out into non-​​awareness. For how can we enjoy the loss of awareÂness if we don’t .… well, you get the picture.
A return to that garÂden in a state fully human would mean someÂthing quite difÂferÂent from our expulÂsion from that same garÂden after sudÂdenly disÂcovÂerÂing ourÂselves, becomÂing conÂscious of ourÂselves. We would go back with the knowlÂedge gained from thouÂsands of years of civÂiÂlizaÂtion, along with bilÂlions of years in our DNA. As Rilke said, there would be no place that couldn’t see us. Our Freudian guardians would be watchÂing too, from below the surÂface of the ice-​​cold waters. We would no longer be burstÂing forth into our creÂative selves for the first time, but going back with infiÂnitely more on our shoulders.
That man from Asheville would be right in a cosÂmic sense. Perhaps in a comic sense, as well.
There are small ways to go part of the way back, howÂever. There is music, dance, love, makÂing love, singing, becomÂing one with the crowd at a conÂcert, a sportÂing event, a politÂiÂcal rally. There are walks along the strand, at midÂnight, with the wind and the waves crashÂing into us, and the seagÂulls laughÂing, and the memÂoÂries pulling us harder than the strongest moon. There are the tastes and smells made famous by Huysmans and Proust, which draw us deeply into the past as we lose the present. There is the laughÂter of a child to send us back yet again to an earÂlier time when we, too, laughed in innoÂcence and with abanÂdon — laughed at the simÂplest things, at the sight of packÂages being unwrapped and paper floatÂing in the air. Just floating.
But that’s not quite there, not quite. Something more drasÂtic must be done to take us back to the garÂden. All the way back. Something that takes years of intense pracÂtice and daily sacÂriÂfice, if we want to avoid artiÂfiÂcial means. Or the last leap.
Â
When peoÂple see some things as beauÂtiÂful,
other things become ugly.
When peoÂple see some things as good,
other things become bad.Being and non-​​being creÂate each other.
Difficult and easy supÂport each other.
Long and short define each other.
High and low depend on each other.
Before and after folÂlow each other.Therefore the Master
acts withÂout doing anyÂthing
and teaches withÂout sayÂing anyÂthing.
Things arise and she lets them come;
things disÂapÂpear and she lets them go.
She has but doesn’t posÂsess,
acts but doesn’t expect.
When her work is done, she forÂgets it.
That is why it lasts forever.Â
From the Tao Te Ching, by Lao-​​tzu. Translated by Stephen Mitchell.
Â
Consciousness of: Our way out of the garÂden. The non-​​contrived empÂtyÂing of conÂsciousÂness: Our way back.
Â
Â



I like the way you explain this form of spirÂiÂtual gain, unfoldÂing the extent and imporÂtance of it. One way for me to get back to the garÂden is an action of the moment, though surely the abilÂity to realÂize such moments comes from the kind of growth over time that you describe. I find my way back, then, through attenÂtive lookÂing, and in the folÂlowÂing way:
In the park, or on a shaded street, I will find a tree whose sysÂtem of branchÂing invites, and I will admire how the branches grow out and how the foliage creÂates a necÂesÂsary patÂtern. I will cirÂcle round and round underÂneath the tree examÂinÂing the arrangeÂment of branches and leaves and notÂing how the light filÂters through from above in difÂferÂent shimÂmerÂing forms and qualÂiÂties as I adjust my posiÂtion. The attenÂtiveÂness and the rhythÂmiÂcal flow of this mere aesÂthetic activÂity perÂmit me to let go of conÂsciousÂness, and as I go about in this light and look up and back at the light I can for these moments divest myself of the feelÂings of care and mild shame that come from the awareÂness, in the Eden story a new and trouÂbling awareÂness, of the light that looks down, of being watched from above. In actÂing as one who is watchÂing I am someÂhow not being watched and of course the effect is addiÂtionÂally desirÂable in that in these moments I am at one with nature’s necÂesÂsary and nourÂishÂing patÂtern. My lookÂing back out to the light retraces, in litÂtle, the steps of seizÂing upon awareÂness and using that accuÂmuÂlated knowlÂedge to deliver the return to pre-​​consciousness and to the recovÂery of forÂtuÂnate innoÂcence that you talk about as freeÂdom from conÂsciousÂness and at the same time conÂsciousÂness reacÂquainted and reaffirmed.