[Guest blog­ger du jour Tony Jones]

Master Po and Kwai Chang Caine

Master Po and Kwai Chang Caine


What’s the mys­tique about mys­ti­cism? (Or is the ques­tion itself just a mis­lead­ing fork in the road, excluded mid­dle term, dun leaves dead on a worm-​​ridden tree, as in “not see­ing the for­est for the … ”, regard­ing spirituality).

When I watched Kung Fu as a young child, then as now I was entranced by the mix­ture of action and the ambiance of a kind of deep inner peace that drove it. I think I missed the master-​​pupil “grasshop­per” dynamic, but I was only two or three years old. But then again, I have never really been con­tent with the notion of mas­ter and pupil, either in being a stu­dent, or in being a teacher. Of course, then I had absolutely no idea what the show was about on an intel­lec­tual level and would not have begun to be able to artic­u­late it until late in high school, pos­si­bly. There was a kind of scary and allur­ing neg­a­tive space about it for me.

Bizarre side note on “Pizza Space.” One of the kid shows I watched had a recur­ring film seg­ment about a man mak­ing pizza crust from scratch. As he tossed it into the air in slow motion, and the crust sort of per­co­lated and flapped around in space, it seemed to me that it actu­ally left the room and hung in the void for a while, and then returned. This was only an opti­cal illu­sion cre­ated by the cam­era angle, and prob­a­bly not one intended by the film-​​makers. But “Pizza Space” — which I did not name until a cou­ple years ago — then existed for me as an arche­type of the cre­ative void, the empti­ness in which artis­tic craft occurs, pos­si­bly ex nihilo. (In fact, I think now, never ex nihilo, because there is always some antecedent, but that has not always been my think­ing on the subject…)

I find myself also think­ing about reli­gion in gen­eral in par­al­lel to mys­ti­cism. They are not iden­ti­cal, but they always inform one another. Even those who pur­sue mys­ti­cal expe­ri­ence from a sec­u­lar­ist per­spec­tive — or mate­ri­al­is­tic, empiri­cist angle — are to some degree rely­ing on the insights of those oper­at­ing from within a reli­gious tra­di­tion. (Even to use the term “mys­ti­cism” is to repeat a meme that orig­i­nates within religions.)

Where does art fit in? For many of us, artis­tic expe­ri­ence is our pri­mary engage­ment and appro­pri­a­tion of the numi­nous. And per­haps, in many instances, where the numi­nous grabs us. (To be “rap­tured” after all, does not always imply lit­eral trans­la­tion of the body into heaven … to be “caught up” is maybe not the province of just one spir­i­tual tradition.)

Why did I in two instances above reach back into child­hood to lay hold of some dimen­sion of mys­ti­cal expe­ri­ence? Is it because the impact of the numen in my life then was more intense because of my devel­op­men­tal stage, and because less crowded out by other con­cerns in life? Is this related to what Jesus meant when he said, “Unless you become as lit­tle chil­dren, you can­not enter the Kingdom of God”?

Just ram­blings late at night as my stom­ach rum­bles unquiet at the thought of a long work week, and my cat paws my leg for atten­tion. Not unlike the numi­nous, either in the cat’s paw, or the work week, or the indigestion.


Related Posts: