The Darkroom of Damocles

 

What you see is often not what you see. In wartime, bor­ders van­ish, build­ings, peo­ple, loy­al­ties, trust. Van­ish. Moral­ity, ethics, the truth. Van­ish. Not for every­one, at all times. But for many, and for most of the time. The god of ambi­gu­ity loves war. Per­haps as much as he loves love. As much as he loves the way peo­ple alter their behav­ior when faced with moral dilem­mas. Strife, fear, hatred, betrayal. War feeds all of that. More often than not, we want to see things in black and white, but we really get shades. Or think we do. Blur­ring, in and out of focus, sharp over here, dull and fuzzy over there.

If war has music, it thun­ders all too often. It shrieks and rises into crescen­dos and then tanks. Col­lapses of its own weight. Too many sharps and flats. Too much atonal­ity. But even there, even in the ear, there is ambi­gu­ity. Lan­guage is ambigu­ous. What you thought you heard was not. What they said was not what they said and so on. What you heard you thought ahead of the gate and applied it to the words that came later.

It wasn’t what you thought.

In Willem Fred­erik Her­mans’ bril­liant novel, The Dark­room of Damo­cles, ambi­gu­ity rears its ugly head like an enraged god and crushes mul­ti­tudes. Set in Hol­land dur­ing the Ger­man occu­pa­tion, Her­mans tells the story of one Henri Ose­woudt, a tobac­conist who gets caught up in the Dutch Resis­tance. Caught up in it because a British agent, Dor­beck, appears at his shop one day and sets this in motion. Why does Ose­woudt take orders from Dor­beck, who never really proves who he is? Because when Ose­woudt sees him he sees him­self. The two are nearly twins.

Pho­tos dis­ap­pear and reap­pear. Neg­a­tives have noth­ing on them when devel­oped, or when the devel­op­ment is botched. Ose­woudt com­mits mur­der for Dor­beck, is impris­oned by the Ger­mans and then the Dutch. All things are elu­sive for him. He chases. Is chased. Searches for. Is searched for. Dor­beck becomes his goal and his rai­son d’être.

When things are under­ground, secre­tive, vio­lently secre­tive, it’s easy to choose the wrong thing, the wrong peo­ple, be mis­taken, make mis­takes that kill. Dor­beck may or may not be real, though Her­mans presents him as more than real for Ose­woudt. Her­mans throws in another curve for us when he paints the pic­ture of Osewoudt’s mother, who saw things and was con­sid­ered mad. Did Henri inherit some of this? There is another piece of jar­ring psy­chol­ogy in play. Henri is short, with­out facial hair, and has a high voice. He sees in Dor­beck the man he should have been. He imag­ines being like Dor­beck. The dark hair, the poten­tial beard, the deep voice.

Her­mans is con­sid­ered one of the great­est Dutch nov­el­ists of the 20th cen­tury. The Dark­room of Damo­cles was first pub­lished in 1958. Over­look Press pub­lished a new trans­la­tion by Ina Rilke last year. I rec­om­mend it highly.

 

Please share with oth­ers:
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email

Related Posts

No related posts were found, so here’s a con­so­la­tion prize: Mod­ern Moments.