Weaver

The Great Weaver of Kashmir, by Halldór Laxness

 

After nearly 300 pages (with a bit more than a 100 to go), I don’t know what to make of this novel. I do know that the writ­ing is pow­er­ful, often hal­lu­ci­na­tory, filled with won­der­ful metaphors and poetic sym­bol­ogy. I do know it makes me think of all kinds of things: Death, Suicide, Heaven and Hell, Love, Masks, Mercurial Personalities. Nietzsche is a guid­ing spirit. As are the Icelandic Eddas, and the thou­sand and one jour­neys through love, hedo­nism, faith and beyond per­me­at­ing our culture(s).

The life of a Christian ascetic is some­thing Laxness knew first hand. And the life of a trav­eler. His pro­tag­o­nist, Steinn Elliði, a young poet, sets out from Iceland to become “the per­fect man”. Travels through­out Europe. At this point in the book, he has found his way to a monastery, try­ing to find peace. I imag­ine when I return to his story it will take on another strange shape and find new touchstones.

We learn, through a com­bi­na­tion of inter­nal mono­logue, let­ters, and third per­son nar­ra­tion, some of the vio­lent, poetic, sur­real and volatile work­ings of his mind. Along the way. In search of. Always in search of. Steinn denounces, renounces, then embraces a host of philoso­phies, rejects and redis­cov­ers Catholicism. On the page, his mind is pow­er­ful, which adds intrigue to the oth­er­wise wild swings and bizarre ver­bal ram­blings. Back home in Iceland, a girl, Diljá, may wait for him. Or, per­haps not.

 

*     *     *     *     *

 

Hiking today in the woods, I thought about the novel, and about music. And the arts in gen­eral. I thought about how so many gifted artists take their own lives. And that alters their work. Forever. Pushes us to dig more deeply into the words, the images, the sounds. Trying to find out why. Trying to see if the signs were there all along.

But that’s not how it works, usu­ally. Art is done in the shadow of that desire at times. But rarely for long, extended peri­ods. Here and there. Highs and lows. A sprint, a jagged moment or two or three. Much of an artist’s life may be spent inside hope, even if it ends vol­un­tar­ily. We can’t really box up a life’s work and wrap it up and file it all under sui­cide. Though we often do just that.

Elliot Smith

 

A good friend of mine intro­duced me to the music of Elliot Smith a few years ago. A tremen­dous tal­ent, Smith had a his­tory of sui­cide attempts, depres­sion, drug and alco­hol abuse, before suc­ceed­ing in tak­ing his own life.

But should we look at his work solely in that light? Or the work of any artist who self-​​destructed? It’s some­times hard not to. It was dif­fi­cult not to as I walked through the thick green and brown woods, lis­ten­ing to his songs, look­ing up at a very blue sky.

Which came first, the emo­tional depth, the thought­ful­ness, the melan­choly qual­ity of the per­son, or that dark muse? Was there a causal con­nec­tion between the abil­ity to feel life deeply, with com­pas­sion, with gen­uine empa­thy, an inabil­ity to ward off sor­row, and the desire to end it all?

Beauty, truth, light. Thousands have writ­ten about that trin­ity. Thousands have noted that feel­ing things deeply is not always the way to get through life. Masks are needed. Illusions. Sometimes, seda­tives of one kind or another. Distraction equals cop­ing.

Our artists show us how to feel, really, really feel, really, really see and hear and taste and touch. But who shows them how to over­come the truth and the light?

 

YouTube Preview Image

Between the Bars, by Elliot Smith

 

 

 

 

 

Related Posts: