Saint Francis

St. Francis at Prayer, by Caravaggio. 1602-​​06

 

From where I sit. From where you sit. It’s all rel­a­tive. You’re deluded. No, you are. I think you both are. In The Great Weaver of Kashmir, the young Halldór Laxness, a future Nobel Prize win­ner, gives us ample oppor­tu­nity as read­ers to judge much con­cern­ing delu­sions and illu­sions. The novel is ambigu­ous enough to pro­vide plenty of room, and our weigh­ing and bal­anc­ing of the var­i­ous options will have much to do with our own predilections.

Picking up where I left off a few days ago, our hero (or anti-​​hero), Steinn Elliði, was search­ing for a way to attain per­fec­tion. Thinking he found it in a monastery, he started the process of becom­ing a monk. The last 130 odd pages take him in a few more direc­tions before he appar­ently decides his course. Violent, obses­sive, bizarre direc­tions that befud­dle fam­ily and friends. But I won’t spoil the end­ing by reveal­ing that course …

Laxness is excel­lent in cre­at­ing par­al­lel sto­ries that appear to go on while we see noth­ing of them. They have a life of their own. We feel their con­ti­nu­ity, even though they are off stage. The most impor­tant ongo­ing story is back in Iceland, with Diljá, who has loved Steinn since child­hood. There is a pow­er­ful dénoue­ment between the child­hood friends that sur­prised this reader and helped make the novel. It also made this reader think a great deal about protes­ta­tions of faith, of truth, of the rel­a­tiv­ity of mis­un­der­stand­ings. Sometimes, it may well be that oth­ers know us bet­ter — at least in cer­tain areas — than we know our­selves. And when we protest that oth­ers are under this or that illu­sion about who we really are, per­haps we are under an illu­sion they see through.

When it comes to “higher truths”, the chances that we delude our­selves often increase. The higher we fly, the fur­ther we can some­times sep­a­rate our­selves from real­ity. Not just the real­ity out­side of our­selves, on the ground, among friends, work, fam­ily, coun­try, home. But the real­ity of our own unique tem­pera­ment, per­son­al­ity, and gen­uine desires. What fits. What is right for us in real­ity. What is real.

The per­son doing the fly­ing will often see those who ques­tion that flight as lost and deluded. Clueless. Unable to see the higher real­i­ties and real per­son who soars. He or she may or may not be cor­rect. Assumptions work both ways, many ways, in many direc­tions. But in the world of this novel, while ambigu­ous, I could not help but think that Diljá was on to some­thing, and Steinn refused to lis­ten. The results were tragic.

Sometimes, the per­son soar­ing soars for great rea­sons, and should never let any­one talk them down. “Reality” in that case can be the real illu­sion. We want our artists to fly and ignore the sub­ur­ban rant­i­ngs try­ing to drag them back into the pen of the every­day. We want them to be vision­ary, to flow with their visions beyond the last step cre­ated, and cre­ate more, on and on and on. Creation being the key. But if their trip is one of self-​​denial, mas­sive, crip­pling self-​​denial, then all too often that is not cre­ative, but destructive.

Admittedly, my rel­a­tive per­spec­tive comes into play here. As I see it. As I ana­lyze the sce­nario. There are thou­sands of Steinns who may see their self-​​denial, their self-​​abnegation, their nega­tion of their worldly self as the ulti­mate cre­ative act. Something, in fact, quite holy. Or, they may be run­ning from some­thing, seek­ing escape, seek­ing a shield between who they really are and what they can become through the process of burn­ing away the self.

Steinn Elliði seems to be one of the least “monk­ish” char­ac­ters in mod­ern lit­er­a­ture. His vol­canic per­sonna, his caus­tic wit, his tow­er­ing belief in his own supe­ri­or­ity, and his sur­re­al­ist poetic inven­tions, all point to some­one who is at odds with the very idea of quiet con­tem­pla­tion and the world of the monastery. Yes, stranger things have hap­pened. Augustine was a wild, rebel­lious youth before becom­ing a devoutly pious man. But the 20th cen­tury was not the same as the 4th. Steinn had more choices. And more temptations.

The illu­sion and illu­sions of youth. Choices made. Consequences. Regrets. Some might say, it was fate. Relativity crushes fate with mad laughter …