His 100th. Though he died in 1981, it’s good to see his cen­te­nary has sparked some renewed inter­est in his work, and per­haps a reeval­u­a­tion. No longer is he seen by so many crit­ics as behind the times. No longer is he seen as inca­pable of exper­i­men­ta­tion and mod­ern inno­va­tions. Beyond the crit­i­cal wars, star­ing down at us from within the notes of the music of the spheres, Barber can watch and lis­ten with a wry smile, or stretch his heart to the break­ing point with us while we lis­ten to Adagio for Strings.

Which makes me think about all of the drama when it comes to dis­cussing art. Once it’s all been cat­e­go­rized, com­part­men­tal­ized, accord­ing to “schools”, the bat­tle is lost and we all too eas­ily lose the sense of the music itself. The bat­tle becomes the bat­tle over com­pet­ing inter­pre­ta­tions, instead of what art, music and lit­er­a­ture are really meant to do:

Inspire us, lift us, pro­voke new worlds and new ways to look at old worlds and old ways for­got­ten that should be remem­bered again.

YouTube Preview Image

Cheryl Studer sings two songs by Samuel Barber




Related Posts: