Up in the Air

Up in the Air. Directed by Jason Reitman. 2009.

This is the per­fect movie for our age of chronic immoral­ity in the busi­ness world. This is the per­fect movie for the moment, because it encap­su­lates so much of what is wrong with mod­ern day, monop­oly cap­i­tal­ism in America. The enor­mous pres­sure, the obvi­ous trend, the pow­ers that be all want to force open more and more areas of life to the poten­tial for profit, costs be damned for the rest of us. Life mat­ters not. Health and heart mat­ter not. The con­cen­tra­tion of money in fewer and fewer hands means every­thing. There is no place that cap­i­tal­ism doesn’t see us — as Rilke might have said today — and seek what lit­tle we have left of our own.

George Clooney plays Ryan Bingham, a pro­fes­sional ter­mi­na­tor. He fires peo­ple for a liv­ing. As I watched his excel­lent per­for­mance, I couldn’t help but think how incred­i­ble it was that such a job exists. In the last two years, nine mil­lion Americans have been fired, their lives shat­tered, and here we have a com­pany that actu­ally prof­its might­ily when the econ­omy crashes. And I couldn’t decide which both­ered me more. The fact that cor­po­ra­tions didn’t even have the decency to fire their own work­ers face to face, or that vul­ture cap­i­tal­ists cre­ated yet another indus­try to do the work for them. Bingham’s boss, played by Jason Bateman, can barely con­tain him­self when he talks to his troops about how the econ­omy is going south in a hurry, and ral­lies them to get out there and bring back the bacon. We don’t get to meet any of the bosses who out­source fir­ing their employ­ees to Bateman, but we do get to meet the soon to be ex-​​employees. Reitman used recently fired non-​​actors, and let them impro­vise, which brings obvi­ous authen­tic­ity to those scenes. But the real focus is on Bingham and a new ter­mi­na­tor he takes under his wing, Natalie Keener, played by Anna Kendrick.

We get a fur­ther layer of dis­tance and detach­ment thrown in the mix when Keener pitches a way for their com­pany to save money, which her boss ini­tially loves. Don’t fly all over the coun­try, fir­ing peo­ple in per­son. Set them up with a lap­top and do it over the Internet!! Bingham hates the idea, for sev­eral rea­sons, but the biggest appear to be his love of fly­ing, liv­ing in hotel rooms, and avoid­ing going home. He wants to avoid home so badly he doesn’t really have one, just a tiny apart­ment that repli­cates the hotel rooms he prefers. Bingham man­ages to talk his boss into tak­ing the ambi­tious Keener with him on his rounds “up in the air” and we soon get to the heart of the movie.

Reitman shows us how we insti­tu­tion­al­ize cru­elty and unfair­ness in the mar­ket. I have no idea if he meant to do this con­sciously, but it was all too appar­ent to me as a descrip­tion of some of the ways we ratio­nal­ize what we do to each other. Keener learns all too quickly how hor­ri­ble it is to fire some­one face to face, and it’s not long before she dis­tances her self by man­ag­ing work­ers who fire oth­ers over the Internet. In order for us to live with our­selves, to accept what we do to oth­ers as “nor­mal” and “nat­ural”, we try to put bureau­cratic lay­ers between our­selves and the vic­tims of our actions. We run from the face to face and would rather con­trol oth­ers who get to deal more directly with the effects of indif­fer­ence. This is one aspect of what Hannah Arendt meant by the phrase, “the banal­ity of evil.”

I was sur­prised by the out­come in places. My first guess when I saw that the Internet idea had been accepted was that the ter­mi­na­tors would be ter­mi­nated. The movie goes in another direc­tion. But if we game out the likely pro­gres­sion of that busi­ness model, the Ryan Binghams of this world are not safe either from the rav­en­ous maw of cap­i­tal­ism, which always seeks to grow prof­its, regard­less of what it does to work­ers. Just as some movie stu­dio execs have said they wish they could make movies with­out real actors, I imag­ine many cap­i­tal­ists would love to be able to do with­out human work­ers alto­gether if they could, labor being their biggest cost. First, you get out­sourc­ing to so-​​called third world coun­tries, then you get sub­con­trac­tors clos­ing down those fac­to­ries and out­sourc­ing to even poorer peo­ple on their rick­ety front porches, and before long mech­a­niza­tion will do away with even those jobs pay­ing just pen­nies a day.

But you can’t get blood from a stone. Eventually, America and the world will wake up to the fact that capitalism’s hour is draw­ing to a close. It causes too much volatil­ity, dan­ger, cru­elty and dis­lo­ca­tion in the world, and even the best cap­i­tal­ists are run­ning out of ways to finan­cial­ize it, squeeze work­ers, out­source, sub­con­tract, sub-​​sub-​​contract et al. Eventually peo­ple just aren’t going to put up with being stomped on, while the rich­est 1% hoards more and more of the total pie, and we social­ize their risk but let them keep all of their ginor­mous gains.

All of our lives are “up in the air” until we fig­ure this mess out and learn to allo­cate our resources in a fairer, health­ier, more humane and less dis­rup­tive manner.

 

 

 

Related Posts: