<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Spinozablue &#187; Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spinozablue.com/category/philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spinozablue.com</link>
	<description>An Eclectic Journal of the Arts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:42:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Meaningful Searches, Exits and Traps</title>
		<link>http://www.spinozablue.com/2009/02/1669/</link>
		<comments>http://www.spinozablue.com/2009/02/1669/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Jung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Tolstoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nietzsche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wittgenstein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spinozablue.com/?p=1669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>

<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" align="center"><span style="font-size: medium;"><em><strong>The (Post-)Modern Search for Meaning:</strong></em></span></p>

<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" align="center"><span style="font-size: medium;"><em><strong>Tolstoy’s Escape from the Trap</strong></em></span></p>

<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"> </p>

<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" align="center"><strong>A Reflection by Sean Howard</strong></p>

<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" align="justify"> </p>

<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" align="justify">For the last few years, a close friend has been complaining, with light touch but increasingly heavy heart, of a deep-seated creative malaise, an impasse in his search for an authentic voice and message. Among other sources, his depression can be traced to his intense and academically accomplished engagement with Wittgenstein, whose humbling exposé of the ‘language game’ – and, therewith, what my friend calls “capital-P Philosophy” – leaves him both full of admiration and “with everything – and nothing – to say”. Or, rather, with a desire to say ‘something true’ thwarted by sensitivity to the <em>unrealizable </em>nature of any such (language-based) project. Behind this blockage, we both suspect, lurks the Nietzschean dissolution of, indisseverably, our union with God and God’s with the Word. ‘The Word is dead, long live words’; Nietzsche was trying to open a door to ourselves, roll the stone from the tomb <em>we’re</em> inside, yet for many of his ‘last men’ (and women), the desire for self-expression still rubs (itself out) against the paradoxically definitive absence of modernity.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spinozablue.com/2009/02/1669/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Perils of Binary Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.spinozablue.com/2008/07/168/</link>
		<comments>http://www.spinozablue.com/2008/07/168/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binary Thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.S. Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kierkegaard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spinozablue.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p>Friday, March 28th, 2008</p>
<p>Another way of saying “binary thinking” is “dualistic thinking.” It’s become something of a cliche in postmodernity to decry “western dualism,” so I’m going to avoid the phrase to stave off my own boredom and perhaps make a more trenchant point.</p>
<p>I’ve noticed that North Americans are terrible about seeing things in (cliche again) “black” and “white”, good or bad, this or that. To some extent, just to use ordinary conversational english you have to employ antonyms but that’s not what I’m talking about. Somehow for Northams (I’m not going to use the term Americans b/c of course that includes our friends in Canada and Latin America, and I’m not talking about them in this critique, mainly because I have little knowledge of whether they tend to see things the same way, but I suspect not… ) we hypostatize all of our dualisms into Manichean cosmological struggles.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spinozablue.com/2008/07/168/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

